The Power of a High EQ Coach

Jun 03, 2024By Stephen Keery
Stephen Keery

How Emotional Intelligence Transforms Coaching Experiences

When it comes to coaching, not all coaches are created equal. While qualifications, experience and coaching models matter, one often overlooked yet critical factor is the coach's Emotional Intelligence (EQ).

A high EQ coach can make all the difference in a coaching relationship, providing not just guidance but a deeply transformative experience for the coachee. But what exactly does it mean to have a high EQ coach, and why does it benefit the coachee so profoundly?

Emotional Intelligence (EQ) is defined by Daniel Goleman (1995) as the ability to recognise, understand, manage, and influence emotions, both in oneself and others. High EQ involves key competencies such as self-awareness, self-regulation, motivation, empathy, and social skills. In a coaching context, these competencies allow coaches to navigate complex emotional landscapes, build strong rapport, and create a safe space for exploration and growth (Goleman, 1998).

Research by TalentSmart (2022) found that 90% of top performers have high EQ, demonstrating its critical role in success, including within coaching settings.

A high EQ coach is attuned to the emotional needs of the coachee, creating an environment of trust and psychological safety. This safety net is crucial, as it allows the coachee to open up honestly without fear of judgment. Edmondson (1999) found that teams and individuals who experience psychological safety are 35% more likely to engage in learning behaviours, take risks, and innovate. These are principles that align seamlessly with the coaching process. According to the Institute of Coaching (2022), 75% of coachees reported improved work relationships when coached by an emotionally intelligent coach, highlighting the tangible benefits of high EQ in coaching.

Shot of a doctor holding hands with her patient during a consultation

Empathy is a cornerstone of high EQ

Coaches who listen not only to the words spoken but also to the emotions behind them provide support that feels personalised and validating (Goleman, 1998). Research by Batson et al. (1997) suggests that empathetic interactions can reduce stress, promote a sense of connection and encourage pro-social behaviour. This empathetic approach fosters a stronger connection, ensuring that coaching sessions meet the coachee’s unique needs and contributing to a 20% increase in coaching effectiveness (ICF, 2021).

Coaching often involves discussing sensitive or challenging topics.

High EQ coaches can regulate their own emotions, maintaining composure and objectivity. This skill is critical in preventing biases or emotions from clouding the coaching process (Grant, 2014). Coaches with high EQ also ask powerful, thought-provoking questions that challenge the coachee to reflect and gain insights.

Self-awareness enables the coach to choose questions that guide the coachee to explore underlying beliefs and emotions. For example, instead of asking, "Why did you do that?" a high EQ coach might ask, "What feelings led you to that decision?" This subtle shift encourages deeper self-exploration and promotes a growth mindset (Rock, 2006).

Cute boy is showing height on a wall scale

Coaching is not a one-size-fits-all practice.

High EQ coaches adapt their approach based on the emotional state and needs of the coachee, shifting between being supportive and challenging as needed (Boyatzis & McKee, 2005). This adaptability ensures that coaching remains relevant and impactful, leading to a 25% improvement in coachee satisfaction (Gallup, 2022).

However, challenges can arise when there is a mismatch in EQ levels between coach and coachee. When a coach has high EQ but the coachee has low EQ, potential issues may include resistance to feedback, limited self-awareness, and emotional blockages (Goleman, 1998). A low EQ coachee may struggle with processing emotions and accepting feedback, leading to disengagement. According to a study by the International Coach Federation (ICF, 2021), 30% of coachees with low EQ reported difficulties in benefiting from coaching, underscoring the challenge. High EQ coaches can manage this by setting clear boundaries, offering structured support, and gradually introducing emotional awareness techniques (Grant, 2014).

Conversely, a low EQ coach working with a high EQ coachee can also present difficulties. Coaches with low EQ may struggle with empathy, react dismissively, and fail to adapt to the coachee’s needs (Boyatzis & McKee, 2005). Research indicates that 40% of coachees with high EQ felt disconnected when working with a coach who lacked empathy (Institute of Coaching, 2022). Low EQ coaches may also project their own emotions onto the coachee, creating a biased and ineffective coaching environment (Grant, 2014). A lack of empathy from the coach can increase the coachee’s stress, reducing their willingness to engage openly in the process (Batson et al., 1997).

The benefits of a high EQ coach are rooted in psychological principles.

At its core, coaching aims to facilitate change, which can often trigger resistance, anxiety, and fear (Lewin, 1947). A coach with high EQ can recognise these emotions early, helping the coachee navigate them in a healthy way. Psychological theories, such as Carl Rogers' (1961) Person-Centred Approach, align closely with high EQ coaching. Rogers emphasised the importance of empathy, congruence, and unconditional positive regard; all attributes of a high EQ coach. By providing a non-judgmental and understanding environment, a high EQ coach can support the coachee's journey of self-discovery and change (Rogers, 1961).

Neuroscience also supports the impact of high EQ on coaching outcomes.

Cartoon Brain Lifting Weights on a Purple Background.

The limbic system, responsible for emotional responses, is more likely to trigger defensive behaviours when individuals feel threatened or misunderstood (Goleman, 2006). However, when a high EQ coach provides a safe and empathetic environment, it activates the prefrontal cortex, associated with rational thinking and problem-solving. This shift helps the coachee approach challenges more constructively, enhancing their ability to find solutions and achieve their goals (Rock, 2006).

A high EQ coach is not merely a guide but a catalyst for deep, sustainable change. By creating a trusting and empathetic environment, regulating emotions, and offering insightful questions, high EQ coaches help coachees move beyond surface-level challenges to achieve meaningful growth. The contrast between high and low EQ coaching highlights how essential empathy and emotional intelligence are in promoting a positive and productive coaching experience.

For anyone seeking a coach, considering their level of emotional intelligence is as important as their qualifications and experience. After all, the most impactful coaching relationships are not just about achieving goals but about transforming how individuals understand and manage their emotions—benefits that a high EQ coach is uniquely equipped to deliver.

References

Batson, C.D., Fultz, J., & Schoenrade, P.A. (1997). Distress and Empathy: Two Qualitatively Distinct Vicarious Emotions with Different Motivational Consequences. Journal of Personality, 55(1), pp. 19-39.

Boyatzis, R.E. & McKee, A. (2005). Resonant Leadership. Harvard Business Press.

Edmondson, A.C. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), pp. 350-383.

Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. Bloomsbury Publishing.

Goleman, D. (1998). Working with Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books.

Goleman, D. (2006). Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. Hutchinson.

Grant, A.M. (2014). The Efficacy of Executive Coaching in Times of Organisational Change. Journal of Change Management, 14(2), pp. 258-274.

Institute of Coaching (2022). Coaching and Emotional Intelligence: Research Insights. McLean Hospital, Harvard Medical School Affiliate.

International Coach Federation (ICF) (2021). Global Coaching Study. ICF Research.

Lewin, K. (1947). Frontiers in Group Dynamics. Human Relations, 1(1), pp. 5-41.

Rock, D. (2006). Quiet Leadership: Six Steps to Transforming Performance at Work. HarperCollins.

Rogers, C.R. (1961). On Becoming a Person: A Therapist's View of Psychotherapy. Houghton Mifflin.

TalentSmart (2022). Emotional Intelligence 2.0 Report. TalentSmart, Inc.